|
|
Good employee selection practices makes a difference |
|
In this article, Derek Stockley discusses the difference good employee selection practices make. Many staff performance issues can be avoided if a little extra care is taken. Employment successAt a recent leadership development training program, I asked a question I regularly ask: Knowing what you know now, how many of your current employees would you re-employ? Answer - about 60%. This answer is consistent with previous groups I have trained, as well as general employment survey research. It means that poor employee selection decisions are regularly made. Suitable candidates are not being found. About 40% of employees are not performing well or as expected. In some way, they cause their management a problem. It may be poor attitude or interpersonal problems. It may be they cannot perform their duties properly. Are sound employee selection practices worth the effort?In time management programs, I sometimes cite recruitment and selection as a good example of the 'Pareto principle' - 20% of the effort produces 80% of the results. It is worth a little extra effort to make a good selection rather than an average one. Spending the time to make a good decision is a sound investment. It is time well spent. Managing performance problems is a constant theme raised by training participants. Amongst other things, poor performance consumes management time. It diverts attention away from more productive matters. Managing performance would not be a major issue if team leaders and managers exercised greater control in the recruitment and selection process. Employee selection tipsThe following tips may help:
I apologise for listing such 'basic' tips. On the face of it, these tips seem relatively straightforward. However, doing them correctly is not easy. For example, thinking about appropriate and non-standard interview questions requires some time. Most candidates should have a coherent answer to: What are your strongest points? What are your weaknesses? Behavioural questions are more helpful: What would you do if ............? How have you approached ..........before? Interviews are not the only thing to rely on - there are other selection techniques as well (see related article below). Summary and conclusionThe number of times I talk to managers and team leaders about performance problems, and discover that the problems existed from the very start, prompts me to re-inforce the basics. Remember, team leaders and managers consistently rate their own performance (or their organisations) at only a 60% employment success rate. Successful employment practices rely on getting the basics right. It takes a little extra effort and some extra time, but that effort is well rewarded. An efficient and effective employee saves time and contributes positively to organisational success. A poor employment selection only brings problems and stress - even if the person leaves smoothly. Related articleThis topic is also discussed at: recruitment selection article. Your commentIf you have a comment you would like to make, or would like to share a similar experience, please send the comment to one of the email addresses listed below. |
|
You can subscribe to this free newsletter. Only your name and email address is required, see: High Performance Newsletter Administration page. Your privacy is protected, see privacy page. To review the newsletter, see: Listing of recent newsletter articles. You can publish this article, provided that you meet certain requirements, see: High Performance Newsletter Publication page. The major portals on this site are: Training Courses and Consulting, Learning, Performance Management and Website Optimisation. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Web Re-design Tutorial | E-learning Tutorial | Management Guru Resource HRD (Training/Development) Overview | Performance Management Guide This page was last modified on 15 September 2005. |